Showing posts with label applying logic to analyzing the ATR observations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label applying logic to analyzing the ATR observations. Show all posts
Friday, September 21, 2018

Come help bring ATR issues to the plate for the next contract

›
Come to the MORE Caucus (UFT) meeting, tomorrow, Saturday, Sep. 22, 12-3 pm, at the CUNY Graduate Center, rm. 5414. Bring concerns, whethe...
15 comments:
Monday, February 13, 2017

Why is the UFT allowing supervision of ATRs by two different types of supervisor? Or 'The stealth revision of the contract'

›
Beware the agreements that the UFT gets from the NYC DOE. It usually means something toxic has become in the power of the DOE. Witness the ...
14 comments:
Tuesday, November 15, 2016

ATR Workshop, independent, sponsored by the MORE caucus UFT, November 19

›
ATR Workshop, sponsored by the MORE UFT caucus. Saturday, November 19 at 1 PM - 4 PM The Graduate Center, CUNY 365 5th Ave, New Yor...
2 comments:
Sunday, October 9, 2016

ATR's letter, on legal issues we face

›
A letter by an ATR to attorney Maria  Chickedantz: Dear Ms. Chickedantz,    I thought I would present my views on the ATR issue ...
5 comments:
Wednesday, January 6, 2016

ATRs' lawsuit on observation violations

›
Some ATRs are starting a class action suit on the issue of observations. The lawsuit focuses on making a complaint contending that the ...
7 comments:
Monday, November 23, 2015

The field supervision program deceives on its pledge to help place teachers, so why does the UFT support the DOE's program?

›
The United Federation of Teachers backs the New York City DOE's observation program of teachers in the Absent Teacher Reserve. Read th...
4 comments:
Friday, November 6, 2015

Proof that DOE/UFT expects ATRs to countermand administrators, and proof that the UFT advocates for the DOE, not for teachers or parents

›
There is clear proof that the DOE's field supervisors have given U ratings to ATRs out of license and has expected ATRs to usurp the a...
2 comments: